Difference between revisions of "Medieval Philosophy Top Ten Booklist"
(→Primary Sources) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[File:TolleLege.jpg|left|270px|thumbnail|Augustine's Conversion]] | ||
| + | Here you will find a small reading list for medieval philosophy. It should be noted: when talking about the history of philosophy we must separate the primary texts from the secondary literature. So, this medieval philosophy booklist will be separated into the most influential primary texts in the history of medieval philosophy, essentially what comprises the content of historical study of medieval philosophy, and then some of the corresponding secondary literature on these sources. | ||
| − | + | As far as the primary sources are concerned, I included Augustine, Boethius, Anselm, Abelard, Aquinas and Duns Scotus. These six are, in my opinion, the major players in the Middle Ages. Some might argue for the inclusion of Bonaventure and/or Ockham at the expense of Abelard, so let me justify my pick. Many in academia have rightly pointed that the later quodlibetal format utilized by Aquinas and Ockham, as well as others, is an evolution of Abelard’s <i>Sic et Non</i>. | |
| + | |||
| + | Though Anselm is most often noted as the founder of scholasticism, Abelard was much more radical in his dialectical approach and methodology, serving as an important bridge between Anselm and Peter Lombard’s <i>Sentences</i>, which was the primary textbook for philosophical education in the Middle Ages. So, if we are discussing the most influential philosophers of the Middle Ages qua philosophers, Abelard is in his rightful place among the top six. If we were to recast this list as the most influential philosophers of the Middle Ages qua theologians, Bonaventure and/or Ockham could duke it out for spot number six. | ||
| − | As far as the | + | As far as the secondary literature is concerned, I only included two sources on particular figures, Augustine and Aquinas, because they are, arguably, the two most influential figures of the period. Rist’s monograph on Augustine was extremely successful and masterfully demonstrates the dependence early Christian philosophy had on the NeoPlatonic tradition. Among an increasingly growing and vast pool of secondary literature on Augustine, Rist’s <i>Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized</i>, remains one of the most respected and continually visited monographs by contemporary scholars. Though there is similarly, a massive amount of secondary literature on Thomas Aquinas, Stump’s monograph treats him in a rigorous, analytic fashion, delivering a comprehensive overview of the Angelic doctor’s philosophical framework and method. The other two texts, <i>History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle </i> and <i>The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy</i> both provide glances of the period as a whole, but approach this dubious task in very different ways. |
| − | + | Gilson’s book is perhaps the most cited historical analysis of medieval philosophy in the twentieth century, providing a meta-narrative in one singular voice. <i>The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy</i> has an impressive collection of essays from nearly all the top scholars in medieval philosophy, including essays on historical context, analysis of particular thinkers, and numerous thematic considerations. In my opinion, it is an indispensable aid to anyone in history of philosophy, most particularly medieval philosophy. | |
===Primary Sources=== | ===Primary Sources=== | ||
The following are in chronological order, beginning with Augustine (4/5th century) and ending with Duns Scotus (13th/very early 14th century): | The following are in chronological order, beginning with Augustine (4/5th century) and ending with Duns Scotus (13th/very early 14th century): | ||
| − | 1. Augustine, <i>Confessions</i>, trans. Henry Chadwick. (Oxford University Press, 2009). | + | 1. Augustine, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0199537828/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0199537828&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=afea43ec06ab2e72f2112c80bbb1a1e5 Confessions]</i>, trans. Henry Chadwick. (Oxford University Press, 2009). |
| − | 2. Boethius, <i>Consolation of Philosophy</i>, trans. Joel Relihan. (Hackett, 2001). | + | 2. Boethius, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0872205835/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0872205835&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=3060650e0b64c6a14340e1a1a09b8f5b Consolation of Philosophy]</i>, trans. Joel Relihan. (Hackett, 2001). |
| − | 3. Anselm, <i>Proslogion</i>, trans. Thomas Williams. (Hackett, 1995). | + | 3. Anselm, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0872205657/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0872205657&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=178925a0213286e3cfc9d6124b657e68 Proslogion]</i>, trans. Thomas Williams. (Hackett, 1995). |
4. Abelard, <i>Scito te Ipsum </i>, trans. David Luscombe. (Claredon Press, 1971). | 4. Abelard, <i>Scito te Ipsum </i>, trans. David Luscombe. (Claredon Press, 1971). | ||
| − | 5. Aquinas, <i>Treatise on Happiness & Treatise on Human Acts</i>, trans. Thomas Williams with commentary by Christina Van Dyke. (Hackett, 2016). | + | 5. Aquinas, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1624665292/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1624665292&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=9ddaa6e06e8fd5ea00029e2e485b3f87 Treatise on Happiness & Treatise on Human Acts]</i>, trans. Thomas Williams with commentary by Christina Van Dyke. (Hackett, 2016). |
| − | 6. Duns Scotus, <i>Philosophical Writings</i>, trans. Allan B. Wolter. (Hackett, 1987). | + | 6. Duns Scotus, <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0872200183/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0872200183&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=2334525500ca41153b244d736aa0921b Philosophical Writings]</i>, trans. Allan B. Wolter. (Hackett, 1987). |
===Secondary Sources=== | ===Secondary Sources=== | ||
| − | 7. Gilson, Etienne. <i>History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages</i>. (Random House, 1954). | + | 7. Gilson, Etienne. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0394428668/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0394428668&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=33e55700ab6a6b840990e9980adffb95 History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages]</i>. (Random House, 1954). |
| + | |||
| + | 8. Rist, John. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521589525/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0521589525&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=376eef54a87c7aee7df77536f8a07305 Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized] </i>. (Cambridge University Press, 1994). | ||
| + | |||
| + | 9. Stump, Eleonore. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415378982/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0415378982&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=10f5696819d3d7d81d5771293b2fd24d Aquinas]</i>. (Routledge, 2008). | ||
| − | + | 10. Pasnau, Robert, and Christina van Dyke, eds. <i>[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1107630010/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1107630010&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=6a4b85b328a5a879528b0f122a4d1db2 The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy]</i>. (Cambridge University Press, 2010). | |
| − | + | {{Contributors}} | |
| − | + | [[Category:Booklists]][[Category:Expert Booklists]][[Category:History of the Middle Ages]] [[Category:Philosophy]][[Category:Religious History]] | |
Latest revision as of 21:14, 7 December 2017
Here you will find a small reading list for medieval philosophy. It should be noted: when talking about the history of philosophy we must separate the primary texts from the secondary literature. So, this medieval philosophy booklist will be separated into the most influential primary texts in the history of medieval philosophy, essentially what comprises the content of historical study of medieval philosophy, and then some of the corresponding secondary literature on these sources.
As far as the primary sources are concerned, I included Augustine, Boethius, Anselm, Abelard, Aquinas and Duns Scotus. These six are, in my opinion, the major players in the Middle Ages. Some might argue for the inclusion of Bonaventure and/or Ockham at the expense of Abelard, so let me justify my pick. Many in academia have rightly pointed that the later quodlibetal format utilized by Aquinas and Ockham, as well as others, is an evolution of Abelard’s Sic et Non.
Though Anselm is most often noted as the founder of scholasticism, Abelard was much more radical in his dialectical approach and methodology, serving as an important bridge between Anselm and Peter Lombard’s Sentences, which was the primary textbook for philosophical education in the Middle Ages. So, if we are discussing the most influential philosophers of the Middle Ages qua philosophers, Abelard is in his rightful place among the top six. If we were to recast this list as the most influential philosophers of the Middle Ages qua theologians, Bonaventure and/or Ockham could duke it out for spot number six.
As far as the secondary literature is concerned, I only included two sources on particular figures, Augustine and Aquinas, because they are, arguably, the two most influential figures of the period. Rist’s monograph on Augustine was extremely successful and masterfully demonstrates the dependence early Christian philosophy had on the NeoPlatonic tradition. Among an increasingly growing and vast pool of secondary literature on Augustine, Rist’s Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized, remains one of the most respected and continually visited monographs by contemporary scholars. Though there is similarly, a massive amount of secondary literature on Thomas Aquinas, Stump’s monograph treats him in a rigorous, analytic fashion, delivering a comprehensive overview of the Angelic doctor’s philosophical framework and method. The other two texts, History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle and The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy both provide glances of the period as a whole, but approach this dubious task in very different ways.
Gilson’s book is perhaps the most cited historical analysis of medieval philosophy in the twentieth century, providing a meta-narrative in one singular voice. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy has an impressive collection of essays from nearly all the top scholars in medieval philosophy, including essays on historical context, analysis of particular thinkers, and numerous thematic considerations. In my opinion, it is an indispensable aid to anyone in history of philosophy, most particularly medieval philosophy.
Primary Sources
The following are in chronological order, beginning with Augustine (4/5th century) and ending with Duns Scotus (13th/very early 14th century):
1. Augustine, Confessions, trans. Henry Chadwick. (Oxford University Press, 2009).
2. Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy, trans. Joel Relihan. (Hackett, 2001).
3. Anselm, Proslogion, trans. Thomas Williams. (Hackett, 1995).
4. Abelard, Scito te Ipsum , trans. David Luscombe. (Claredon Press, 1971).
5. Aquinas, Treatise on Happiness & Treatise on Human Acts, trans. Thomas Williams with commentary by Christina Van Dyke. (Hackett, 2016).
6. Duns Scotus, Philosophical Writings, trans. Allan B. Wolter. (Hackett, 1987).
Secondary Sources
7. Gilson, Etienne. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. (Random House, 1954).
8. Rist, John. Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized . (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
9. Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. (Routledge, 2008).
10. Pasnau, Robert, and Christina van Dyke, eds. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. (Cambridge University Press, 2010).