What is the history of presidential transitions in the United States

Fortunately for the United States, presidential transitions have generally been smooth and mostly without trouble. However, in a few cases some of the transitions were awkward or even hostile to an extent. The history of transitions have also sometimes set precedent followed to this day.

Early History

The first presidential transition between George Washington and John Adams in 1797 was not only peaceful but relatively easy given the two men had a generally strong respect for the other. On his first day in post, George Washington reportedly allowed Adams to enter before him to symbolize that a new president was now in charge. The first real challenge for the country's presidential transition, however, occurred in 1801, when John Adams lost to Thomas Jefferson in the 1800 election and the latter took power (Figure 1). Adams and Jefferson had been former friends and they had disagreed bitterly over a variety of national and international issues. The transfer of power signaled that the country would go in a different direction as the Democratic-Republican Party party took power. The issue of being allies with France, for instance, was just one issue dividing the two men. The election took place from October 31st-December 4th, reflecting the slow process of election and the needed time until March of the following year to complete the transition. Early in the morning of March 4, 1801, after the bitter election that was ultimately decided by the House of Representatives, John Adams took an early morning stagecoach and left Washington to go live back in Quincy, Massachusetts. He had skipped the inauguration and did not personally greet the incoming president at the White House. However, by leaving without any major effort to stop Jefferson despite the bitter feud between the two and difficult election, it demonstrated for the first time that two rival parties could transition to power without conflict. This, historians have argued, did help establish an important precedent for peaceful political transitions.

There were other difficult transitions in US history, particularly the 1861 transition to the Lincoln presidency. As Lincoln was taking power, southern states had already declared their succession and James Buchanan had effectively refused to do anything direct on the issue without Congress. The inaction by Buchanan, and failure of Congress to pass anything other than appeasement measures, led to Lincoln taking power with the country literally falling apart. Lincoln, nevertheless, wanted to show unity on Inauguration Day, taking a carriage ride with Buchanan after he took his oath of office. Buchanan went on to write one of the first presidential memories to justify his actions, while Lincoln quickly moved to refuse any compromise with southern states, leading to the Civil War.

Later History

The Twentieth Amendment moved inauguration to January 20th since 1933. At this time, the transition from Herbert Hoover to Franklin Roosevelt also appeared to be potentially volatile. Both had argued different methods for healing the mounting economic crisis that became the Great Depression during the campaign, with Roosevelt's New Deal policies winning out over Hoover's cooperative volunteerism. Within a day after the election, Hoover conceded and wrote: 'In the common purpose of all of us, I shall dedicate myself to every possible helpful effort' in reference to his planned assistance in the transition. However, soon after this statement, Hoover moved to try to get Roosevelt to change his mind about enacting New Deal measures, such as the public works plan. Roosevelt reacted by refusing to collaborate with the outgoing president, leading to tension between the two. By the time inauguration came around, the two rivals did decide to take the now customary carriage ride together. The lack of preparation and cooperation by Roosevelt and Hoover did possibly delay some relief measures that could have helped households, but nevertheless Hoover never really formally attempted to block Roosevelt from taking power or enacting his policies. President Harry Truman helped to set a positive tone and precedent by also inviting the president-elect, Dwight D. Eisenhower, after the 1952 election, to the White House and directly ordering federal agencies to work with the Eisenhower team in preparation for the transition.

Although presidential transitions were sometimes tense, on the outside the transitions have been peaceful throughout US history with no incident of verified violence that was encouraged by any side. However, until 1963, there was no formal law that governed how a presidential transition would be handled. To help ensure a continuity of a peaceful and orderly transition, The Presidential Transition Act of 1963 was passed. The act enabled mechanisms for a formal transition, including for the incoming president to access branches of the government to ensure that the incoming president could have knowledge of key information prior to taking office. This act has continually been changed and amended to enable formal links of the government with the incoming president, including establishing the General Services Administration (GSA) Administrator to formally write an "ascertainment" letter that would declare a non-incumbent candidate to be an "apparent winner". This would formally release federal money to enable the transition for the incoming president.

Recent History

In recent history, the messy process of transition between presidents was most felt as a consequence of the 2000 election. That election was ultimately resolved when the Supreme Court ruled to halt the Florida recount, leading to Gore conceding in December 13, 2000. That meant that the formal transition from Clinton to Bush in 2000-2001 had only one month, among the shortest transitions in presidential history. Ultimately, after the 9/11 disaster, the 9/11 Commission concluded that this slow transition and limited time in preparation and sharing of information likely "hampered" the Bush administration's ability to put key people in national security roles. Given the lessons learned, the Bush administration made a concerted effort to quickly accept Obama's 2008 election victory so that the transition could be done quickly and without problems. The incoming Obama administration was able to gain access to classified and other information that enabled them to access different branches of the government, which also facilitated their response to the 2008 financial crisis. This helped to ensure that national security data, in particular, could be shared within a day after Obama was declared the winner. With this lesson, Obama also made a point to enable an easy transition to Trump's presidency, inviting the president-elect two day after the November 2016 election. As of November 22, 2020, the Trump administration has yet to concede the results of the November 3 election. This has been the first election since the 1933 transition to Roosevelt that the incumbent administration has worked to impede a transition to the next president. One difference is that Hoover did not do this publicly and there were limited processes that established a formal transition. Since the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, only the 2000 and 2020 elections took more than two days to enable the GSA to formally start the transition process to the incoming administration.

Summary

In the history of presidential election, there has been no shortage of acrimony between rivals for the country's top elected job. However, even before formal laws were established, and despite personal acrimony, presidential transitions since 1801 have been relatively without trouble. Presidents such as Hoover did sometimes work behind the scenes to impede the incoming administration's policies, but no president has formally impeded the process once election results were certified. In fact, only the 2000 and 2020 elections have taken more than a few days after the election to formally launch the transition process. For the 2000 election, it did provide important lessons that limiting the transition time can have negative consequences for the country, particularly on national security issues.